Fort Collins Audubon Society
Board of Directors Meeting
Monday July 22, 2002
EDM International, Inc., 4001 Automation Way, Fort Collins, CO
DRAFT
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 pm by President Rick Harness.
Attendees: Rick Harness (President), Bill Miller
(VP/Conservation Chair), John Waddell (Treasurer), Dave Dubois (Director),
Beth Dillon (Director), Nick Komar (Field Trips), Rick Schroeder
(Publicity), Ann Molison (Membership), Barb Turnbull (Hospitality), Ron
Harden (AOC Delegate)
Guests: None
Minutes of Previous Meeting:
Minutes from the meeting of April 4, 2002 were reviewed. Ron Harden
commented that the statement made by Judy Scherpelz (last sentence in the
next-to-last paragraph on page 2), while valid at one time, is no longer
valid. The Greenway Nature Center and associated Raptor Center is now
operated by the City of Pueblo and is no longer an Audubon nature center.
The minutes were approved as written.
2002 NAS Annual Report:
Rick Harness reported that the FCAS annual report had been sent to AOC in
June.
Treasurer's Report:
John Waddell distributed a copy of Treasurer's report showing a
balance as of July 22, 2002 of $4,692.66. Expenditures since April 7th
appear to be $907.22; receipts since April 7th appear to be $3543.22. In
addition, there is a reserve of $485.90 at the post office, and a
liability of $194.27 for the Raptor Video Fund, for total assets of
$4984.29. (NOTE: Expenditures and receipts were derived from the report
distributed by John, and calculated after the Board meeting.)
Considerable discussion was had about addressing the declining revenues
from National Audubon Society (NAS) based on the numbers of chapter
members. Ann Molison stressed that, under policies recently adopted by
NAS, chapter dues-sharing revenues derived from membership would
eventually be dependent upon the number of new members that FCAS recruits,
and that the chapter would need to generate new revenue streams, other
than Birdathon and NAS dues-sharing. John Waddell indicated that he is
uncertain as to what the future dues-sharing revenues from NAS will be.
Molison gave some examples on a month-by-month basis of members recruited
by the chapter, recruited by NAS, members who transferred in or out of
FCAS, and members who didn't renew their memberships with NAS. Information
provided about a year ago was repeated, indicating that FCAS needs to
recruit about 87 to 90 new members each year to maintain a revenue stream
equivalent to that prior to NAS' restructuring of the dues-sharing
formulas.
An ad hoc Financial Committee consisting of Rick Harness (President),
Bill Miller (VP), John Waddell (Treasurer) and Ann Molison (Membership)
will meet in September to develop fund-raising strategies.
Rick Schroeder reported that the Birdathon has generated approximately
$4,700 this year, with some monies yet to be collected and sent in.
NEW BUSINESS:
AOC Update:
Ron Harden (AOC delegate) gave an extensive update of activities at the
State Chapter. There was considerable concern expressed by chapter
representatives at the June 8th AOC Board meeting regarding chapter
relations. A committee was created to consider how to blend NAS objectives
with chapter needs and make recommendations to the whole AOC Board. The
task force has had two telephone conference calls to date. Prior to the
second conference call on July 10th each member of the task force was to
submit a statement to the others and Susan Kirkpatrick. (NOTE: Harden's
statement is shown in its entirety at the end of these minutes.) The
committee will have a face-to-face meeting in Denver on Aug. 3rd to
discuss what will be presented to the AOC Board at its next meeting in
September.
Part of the dissatisfaction on the part of chapter representatives
stems from the fact that NAS is not honoring the plan submitted by the
Colorado Audubon Council (NOTE: C.A.C. consisted of chapter
representatives and met three times per year) regarding the establishment
of a state office. He also indicated that some chapter representatives
have not been showing up for the AOC Board meetings which negates the
principal that chapter representatives on the AOC Board were to number one
more than the number of non-chapter AOC Board members. Harden expressed
the very strong opinion that chapter representatives were to be
responsible to their chapters by representing chapter concerns and issues
to the AOC Board as well as communicating back to their chapters the
business conducted by the AOC Board.
Harden further indicated that he would prefer that the committee (and
AOC Board) initially deal directly with Carol Warden, NAS national
development director, before any effort is relayed directly to NAS. Harden
asked the FCAS Board if he was on the right track in generating his
comments about NAS/chapter relations. Other FCAS Board members present
indicated that Harden summarized well their own dissatisfaction in
NAS/chapter relations.
Miller commented that the chapters are expected to put in a lot of
effort to get an Audubon Nature Center established in their area, but then
NAS hires a director for the nature center. The nature center's
fundraising efforts then end up competing directly with the local chapter
for financial resources. About the only thing that the chapter gains from
this process is that chapter members now have a place to volunteer their
time. Miller further commented that National's past strength was based on
its grassroots support from chapters, which are now feeling alienated.
Harden indicated that NAS/chapter relationships have turned from a two-way
street to a one-way street.
Harden indicated that he would include in his comments for the Aug. 3rd
committee meeting the following ideas:
1) NAS didn't provide an appropriate educational effort to chapters
regarding the proposed changes in dues-sharing;
2) NAS didn't adequately determine the financial impacts upon chapters
by the changes in dues-sharing;
3) There was no chapter input into the Essential Elements;
4) The organization and management of Nature Centers was not adequately
explained.
Harden then informed the FCAS Board that Susan Kirkpatrick has tendered
her resignation as the Executive Director of Audubon Colorado, effective
August 30th. He expressed the opinion that Susan had provided good
leadership but was caught in the middle between National's policies and
chapter needs. Board members echoed Harden's sentiments.
Harden also advised the Board that Jo Evans is planning on retiring as
the Audubon Lobbyist, and that Jo's daughter, Jen Bolton, is being
recommended to the AOC Board for consideration as Jo's replacement.
Updated goals for 2002:
The Board reviewed the chapter's goals for 2002. It was agreed that we
either are meeting the goals established at the beginning of the year or
are working towards accomplishing them. Komar indicated that he would
appreciate help with coordinating field trips. Under the discussion of the
goals under Science and Conservation Komar gave a brief report on
the progress of the Nature Center Committee. Miller updated the Board with
the news that George Wallace, Executive Director for the Rocky Mountain
Bird Observatory (RMBO), a potential Nature Center partner, has resigned
his position with RMBO. However, Miller and Judy Scherpelz, Director of
the Rocky Mountain Raptor Program (RMRP), were going to hold a meeting on
Thursday, July 25th, anyway.
Standing Committee Reports:
It was decided to forego the Standing Committee reports in the interest
of being able to conclude the meeting at a reasonable hour, and because
most of the information was being presented during other parts of the
meeting.
OPEN SPACE, YES! endorsement:
Miller briefly explained the OPEN SPACE, YES! Ballot initiative to
extend the current 0.25% sales tax for 25 years, and which would be used
to acquire lands for natural areas, community separators, to preserve
prime agricultural resources and to acquire special places. Without any
discussion Schroeder moved that FCAS endorse the OPEN SPACE, YES! ballot
initiative. Molison seconded the motion and the motion was passed
unanimously.
Annual Meeting (enhanced):
Miller related that Sue Kenney, during her term as president, raised
the idea of that the chapter could do a better job of recognizing the
efforts of its members on behalf of the chapter. At various times informal
discussion has been had that, in addition to the election of officers, the
Annual Meeting in January could be "enhanced" with activities
such as a banquet, a special guest speaker, or even a silent auction.
Molison indicated that she had talked with author Kenn Kaufman about
appearing in January, but that nothing conclusive had been decided.
The Board decided that a program used a fund raiser shouldn't be scheduled
for the annual meeting, as there are too many complications involved. It
was decided that we should pursue having Kaufman appear in the spring.
This would probably be after the publication of his new butterfly guide,
and it might also be possible to arrange for him to lead a bird hike in
addition to being the feature at a fund-raising program. The effort to
recruit Kaufman was turned over to Miller because Molison was leaving town
for several weeks.
An Annual Meeting committee was created to explore the options and
costs of an "enhanced" Annual Meeting. Committee members are:
Molison (chair), Miller, Turnbull and Waddell.
Nominations:
Harness mentioned that we should be thinking about nominations for the
Board to be installed in January.
OLD BUSINESS:
None.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Bill Miller, acting secretary
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
=
STATEMENT FROM RON HARDEN TO AOC CHAPTER RELATIONS COMMITTEE
From: Ronald Harden
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:47 PM
To: BeidlelmanC@aol.com; sbloom@somerville-co.com; Julie Boyle; Johnna
Bravoso;
Susan Kirkpatrick
Subject: input to committee
Colorado Audubon Council was an effective Audubon presence for
Colorado. The chapters believed that presence could be made even more
effective by a state program. There has been disappointment that the
establishment of Audubon Colorado has not afforded more opportunity for
coordinated actions of the Colorado chapters, but rather less.
AoC must rectify this and continue to be the mechanism by which
chapters can coordinate their activities, otherwise there is no reason for
chapters to be involved in AoC. An alternative would be for the chapters
to re-activate CAC as a separate organization, as is the case in New
Mexico.
The need for AoC action could be perceived as more demands on staff
time for chapter needs vs. on national directed programs - but this is not
the case. Operational changes can let the chapters do the work of their
coordinated efforts - as they have always done. Under the regional office
system state members and chapters were supported when they did - and
regional offices were programs of NAS too. To these ends:
1. Before state board meetings the chapters should be given the
opportunity to submit agenda items.
2. State board meetings must be open to any Audubon member to attend and
observe - and be advertised as such far enough in advance.
3. The state board must be recognized as policy making - not just
advisory. This is consistent with NAS guidelines for establishment of
state programs.
A concern among some is that some chapter representatives to the board
are not attending meetings. This should not be corrected by any change in
the ratio of chapter designated board members. A solution would be to
require if a chapter representative misses a certain number of meetings,
the chapter would be asked to designate a different representative.
Another solution would be for each chapter to designate an alternative
representative to attend when the primary cannot. If the specification of
board members were to be changed it should be to have a certain number of
the non-chapter designated board members elected at large by the chapters.
Any of these solutions would preserve the representational aspect of the
board, and avoid the lack of adequate chapter perspective that plagues the
national board.
Lastly, AoC cannot unilaterally develop tactics to address integrating
the Audubon vision with chapter needs. Changes are needed from the
national staff and board.
1. There must come to be an understanding among the chapters, AoC and
the national organization if the national organization will honor the
proposal for establishment of a state program it asked us to develop.
2. This begs the question of to what extent the national organization
respects the concept that Audubon is an organization composed of
component chapters.
3. There must be adequate assessment before hand of how decisions and
actions by the national staff and board effect chapters. Examples are
the dues share change and establishment (not objectives) of nature
centers. It doesn't matter that national conducts an educational
campaign about changes being made, or solicits input - it must face the
reality of the effects on the chapters.
Consequences of not doing the above are:
1. alienation of chapters and chapter activists
2. calls for chapter-only memberships
3. calls for chapters to become independent of NAS
4. anger directed at our executive director who is placed in the middle,
and just doing as directed by national.
These potentials for alienation must not by ignored, alienation is
increasing. Minimizing them in reports or minutes or trying to make things
seem smooth when they are not aggravates the situation. To reduce
alienation National Audubon should not work to establish an Audubon nature
center in an area where a chapter has established or is establishing its
own center.
The previously existing regions, that regional representative on the
national board are elected from, are too large. It is too hard for the
representative to visit around adequately. The number of regions should be
increased with smaller areas in them. There should then be the
corresponding increase in regional representatives on the national board.
These tactics for change will help moderate a growing dissatisfaction
and help bond the national organization and its component chapters in
support of Audubon objectives.
10Jul02 - Ron Harden